Note: On its statement, KBS argued that JYJ is engaging in “dual-contracting” among others. This is factually incorrect, because the JYJ-C-JeS contract is not an exclusive contract and also because the JYJ-SM contract is now null and void.
The below is a translation of the court decision that dismissed SM’s petition for the court to strike down the business relationship of JYJ and C-JeS as dual contracting. The Korean original is posted at DNBN, found here.
Notice the brevity of the court’s opinion. This petition was so without merit that it barely warranted a page to refute it in multiple ways.
Source: Seoul District Court document via DNBN
Translation credit: Inklette@DNBN
Shared by: TheJYJFiles